Legal Action

Potential Plaintiffs:

In order to challenge unconstitutional and improper laws, we need individuals to participate in our efforts as plaintiffs. Click here or email hotline[at]fpchq.org to report possible civil rights violations and let us know you'd like to get involved.

Our amazing members and donors make our legal action and lawsuits possible.

Click here to support FPC's legal action programs!

Some of our FPC Legal Action programs include:

Sharp, et al. v. California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, DOJ, et al.

Sharp, et al. v. California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, et al. is a constitutional challenge to the DOJ's defective "bullet button assault weapon" registration system that prevented many Californians from registering their firearms before July 1, 2018, thus denying them exemption from many serious criminal laws, and a petition for writ of mandate to require the DOJ to register their firearms as many individuals intended to do before July 1.

FPC, FPF Comment in Opposition to ATF's Proposed "Bump-Stock" Ban Rulemaking (docket no. 17R-22)

Attorneys for Firearms Policy Coalition and Firearms Policy Foundation submitted over 900 pages of analysis and supporting exhibits, including a video that shows the actual operation of a “bump-stock-device” on an AR-15 type firearm, in an extensive opposition that shows the Trump Administration’s illegal proposed ban fails every test.

Guardanapo v. Washoe County School District, et al.

Federal lawsuit challenging the school district's and Kendyl Depoali Middle School's ban on wearing pro-gun rights FPC tee shirts and overbroad dress code policy banning pro-gun rights free speech
VICTORY! Secured a judgment against the school district, wherein they admitted to violating G.M.'s rights, and payment of $25,000 in attorneys fees.

Holt, et al. v. Attorney General Xavier Becerra

Constitutional and statutory challenge to CA DOJ's "bullet-button assault weapon" regulations

DeLuz, FPC, CGF v. California Department of Justice

Constitutional and statutory challenge to CA DOJ's denial of access to DOJ firearm regulations

Wiese, FPC et al., v. Becerra

Federal lawsuit challenging the State of California's confiscatory ban on "large-capacity" magazines

Avitabile, FPC et al v. State of New York, Lt. Col. Beach

Federal Second Amendment lawsuit challenging New York’s ban on Tasers and other “less-than-lethal” electronic self-defense weapons

Publius & Hoskins v. Diane Boyer-Vine

First Amendment “Tyrant Registry” free speech lawsuit
VICTORY! U.S. Chief District Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill ordered a permanent injunction (matching the preliminary injunction).

Hulbert, FPC et al. v. Annapolis, Maryland Mayor Mike Pantelides, et al.

Federal Second Amendment lawsuit challenging Annapolis, MD's ban on Tasers and other “less-than-lethal” electronic self-defense weapons
VICTORY: Full repeal!

Gallinger, FPC et al. v. California Attorney General Xavier Becerra

Ninth Circuit
Constitutional challenge to California Senate Bill 707, exemptions for retired government employees

FPC SADC, et al. v. California Attorney General Kamala Harris

First Amendment challenge to California law banning use of Assembly video of gun control bill debates for political speech and FPC advertisements about Proposition 63
VICTORY: U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., issued a preliminary injunction!
VICTORY: Settlement and fee recovery
VICTORY: Full repeal! Legislature completely repealed the law.

Teixeira v. County of Alameda amicus brief